Court stops Senate investigation Natasha Akputti-Udoagen

A federal high court in Abuja issued an interim order that restricted the disciplinary action against Senator Natasha Akputti Udoagen, who represents Kogi Central.

Chairman Judge Obiora Egwuatu issued an order on Tuesday, March 4 after a party application filed by Akpoti-Uduaghan’s lawyers.

The ruling was conducted with the convening of the committee and the possible suspension of senators indefinitely.

The interim order ceases all procedures regarding the matter, awaiting further judicial review.

According to the order of the Registered Court, the court said: “After reading sixty-five (25) paragraphs, the affidavit was held in support of the motion in support of the former partner and the affidavit of urgency, both revoked by Senator Natasha Akputti-Akputti-Akputti-Udoagen, Senator of Adult, Female, Female, Female, Christian, Christian, Christian, Christian, Christian, Christian, and litigation.

“In the hero sanusi musa san, MJ Numa Nuu, YM Zakari Esq., BJ Tabai Esq., Tijan Jimol Esq. and Mc Bekee Esq., Miss, the applicant’s consultant, the applicant’s consultant, and urged the court to grant relief songs.

“The court made a bench decision in an open court, whose reasons and conclusions are contained in the subject of the bench decision. Hereby, by order: 1. The order granted to this honourbale court, granting the plaintiff/applicant the second place-the fourth defendant/respondent, and in alternative ways the original summons and all other accompanying processes in order to ensure that the two nationals are composed of the state or, in the case of the common people, are carried out with wisdom in the case of the nationals.

“2. The interim order of the Honor Court restricts the restrictions of the Commission on Ethics, Privileges and Code of Conduct led by the Fourth Defendant to defend the plaintiff/applicant against alleged misconduct, the investigation is against the renewal of the sequel of 2nd frenry of 2nd the 20 furbr the Debernary on February 25, 2025, hearing and determination of the notice of the intermediate injunction.

“3. This honorable court order is directing the first to fourth defendants to show the cause within 72 hours of service to them, and why the orders to communicate with them should not be approved, thus limiting their investigation of the plaintiffs to investigate the plaintiffs to charge the crime against the plaintiffs, alleging that they ruled the Ruler Houses (Power and Privilege) Act of 1999 in unordered orders.”